Environmentalism and Ecology

In an article entitled, "New Heaven, New Earth: Christian Theology and Ecological Worldview," written by Rev. John Chryssavgis, the idea of human concern for the environment is addressed. He states that "human concern for the environment does not result from superficial or sentimental romanticism: it arises from our effort to honor and dignify God's creation." Humans tend to be caught up in lifestyles that use nature for their own benefit, as opposed to using nature in a non-destructive manner. I do believe that Christians view nature as a gift from God and that is the reason they believe taking care of the environment is so important, but I do not know why people that don't believe in God should care about the environment. What is the reason that drives non-Christians to care for nature? Does it make sense that some Christians do not care about God's creation or should that be viewed as sinful behavior?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Language and Myth

In the discussion of religion, ecology, and the synergy between the two, a primary focal point to be considered is that of language. This is especially relevant with regards to the intersecting point of origin between religion and ecology: creation myths. It is possible to split language into two definitive and binary categories: prozaic language and poetic language. Prose refers to the language of definitions and explanations. It is often a mechanical arrangement of facts, figures and results. This is the language of the scientific method, the ‘APA’ format. Poetry, on the other hand, is an artistic use of language. It is more open-ended, often having a cadence or a rhyme scheme. This artistic use of language can be attributed to the origin of myth. Myths are a form of art. While creation myths are often cited as  an explanation for creation.  However, it has been argued that myths cannot actually be called an explanation because of the most common interpretations of the wor...
Read more

Antartica

Chapter 27 of Ecology of Eden talks about places that we have not touched on this Earth. We discussed this in class, and someone brought up the point that even in places that we have not developed on, they still face the destruction from human activity. For example, Antarctica is hardly inhabited by humans, but is facing extreme threats to its environment because of climate change and global warming. Antarctica is covered by ice that stretches about seven million cubic miles. Within the past fifty years, the west coast of the Antarctica Peninsula has been one of the most rapidly warming places on the entire planet. It has warmed by three degrees Celsius. The temperature of the Southern Ocean that surrounds the continent has increased by more than one degree Celsius in fifty years. This warming causes the wildlife that live there to suffer. Some ice caps have completely collapsed. Penguins have had a decline in their populations, or they have had to relocate their colonies to more st...
Read more

The Most Successful Species

Based off Chapter 6 (pt 1) of Humans in the Landscape Humans and the Food Web Photosynthesizing organisms are the most common in the general food pyramid, followed by herbivores, then omnivores, with carnivores being the most rare at the top of the food chain. However, humans have become the exception. They are an omnivorous species that has used evolution to its advantage. The products of evolution that allowed for bigger brains, bipedalism, tool usage and fire mastering has allowed us to climb to the top of the food chain. This fact puts a far greater stress on environmental resources. Controlling Resources Technical advances and the shaping of modern society have allowed us to “enlarge the carrying capacity” of environments to suit our needs relating to sustenance. However, these “advancements” have come at a cost. Things such as pesticides, GMOs, the Industrial Revolution, and artificial selection have caused general environmental issues like pollution, climate change, tro...
Read more